FreedomAtStake's Blog

North American jurisdictions racing for sports betting dollars

By FreedomAtStake | View all Posts
Posted Monday, February 09, 2009 11:06 AM   15 comments
BANG! The race is on!

The dust is settling after the Presidential race, and now another race is beginning... which North American jurisdiction will be the first to fully embrace sports gambling - and take it online?

Of course, it all begins with first making sports betting legal.

Already in America, there are several jurisdictions that do NOT outlaw sports betting. Those are Nevada (of course), Montana, Oregon, and Delaware.

In Canada, most provinces already allow betting on sports lotteries offering poor odds - including online betting.

But now comes the interesting part... these jurisdictions have to decide whether that are going to sit on the fence or if they are going to attack the market.

Oregon has already hosted sports betting in the past, but was bought off by the NCAA, which is hosting basketball games in Oregon during next month's tournament.

Already, interesting things are happening in Delaware, as USAToday reported last week. While there is expected anti-gambling lobbying to come from the NFL and other leagues, it seems pretty likely that Delaware will soon be offering a sports lottery similar to the Canadian model.

That means that, very soon, there will be legal sports betting within a half-hour drive from Philly, Baltimore, and Atlantic City. I think it is safe to say that the states of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and New Jersey will have to respond or else see millions of their dollars flow to Delaware.

And just as Delaware tries to emulate Canada, now the question in Canada is whether or not to further expand sports betting.

The Toronto Star posted a nice opinion piece over the weekend which points out what everybody already knows... legalized sports betting is on the way, so now is the time to embrace it before somebody else corners the market.

Already, there are rumblings in Canada about removing the legal restrictions against single-event wagering, which would open up the floor for true sports betting.

It looks like Canada is going down the road. And once it is legal in Canada, it's not going to take long before somebody up here starts officially targeting American customers. Hell, the Canadian government is already turning a blind eye while the Kahnawake reserve outside Montreal is already doing just that.

Will America follow, or will it continue to allow other foreign jurisdictions to collect the flow of American money outside the borders?

15 comments
comment Post A Comment
BEHAVE9999 says:
02/09/09 12:01PM
Thank you for the information and thoughts. It is nice to read a clear, well written post regarding something as important as the future of sports gambling in North America.
AJLightning says:
02/09/09 01:53PM
SWEET!
betlarge says:
02/09/09 02:28PM
nice update. Freedom: do you think the governmnent will continue to monoplize the industry or once single event wagering is legal will it be regulated and open for competition?
3825 says:
02/09/09 02:37PM
Perhaps this has already been discussed and I missed it.

How will BetFAir's acquistion of TVG impact sports betting ?

BetFair is already making claims that sports betting exchanges are really parimutual pools (which are legal in many states for horse racing). Betfair simply states that a transaction on a betting exchange is parimutual wager with a pool of two, with the "house" taking a percentage in order to finance the operation of the pool and to pay taxes.

kingme says:
02/09/09 02:37PM
Interesting stuff. I do agree that the trend towards legalized sports wagering is on, and will remain that way for a long time. I'm not holding my breath though. I have a buddy in Oregon that occassionally plays the (state) parlay cards, and they are a joke. I'm talking like paying 4:1 or something ridiculous like that for a four-teamer.

If that is the route of the establishment, and the "legal" way of sports wagering, I will stick to my "illegal" ways (yes I know that it is actually not illegal).

FreedomAtStake says:
02/09/09 02:42PM
3825,

You are ahead of me there. I was going to talk about BetFair/TVG in another post.

3825 says:
02/09/09 03:23PM
Freedom,

If you had 5 minutes with a congressman that has been known to support the legality of on-line gaming, what points would you make ? I've seen the silver fox in a local coffee place from time to time, and I might want to let him know that at least one of his constituents supports these measures.

consiglieri says:
02/09/09 07:17PM
Personally I would rather see things simply return to the way they were a few years ago. I am just fine using an off-shore book, minus all the hassle. More people betting might just mean more corruption and cheating.
starwink says:
02/09/09 07:40PM
The horse and dog tracks were making money hand over fist for a long time. They had no competition. Then the Indian casinos got in the game and took a hefty chunk of the gambling pie from the tracks. They also took regular bar patrons from the bar scene. Then some tracks were able to legislate casino games and slots into their tracks, and the pendulum swung back to the tracks a bit. Most bars have a couple video machines that pay out and the law looks the other way. The legalization of sports gambling is a wild card for all gambling interests.

The lobbying effort will be amazing. Will it be limited to tracks and casinos? Will sports pubs be able to take bets? Will it be available like lottery tickets? Will online sites be legal?

My bet is based on the "Golden Rule". He who has the gold, makes the rules.

number_cruncher says:
02/10/09 08:44AM
Thanks for posting this... I'm not sure why sports betting has gotten the short end of the stick in past years when the government lets people "gamble" on all sorts of other stuff.

I think, and this is purely my own opinion, that sports betting generally is regarded as an illicit, dirty sort of activity because of how much scandals, dirty bookies, etc... stick out in people's mind. Plus, bringing legal books to a place like Toronto, or some place nearby, for example, means that a bettor can place a bet on any of the 3 major sports teams here.
I know there is ProLine in Ontario but this is a slightly different animal. I hope we get some legal books here!
pjrez says:
02/11/09 10:52AM
BETTHEHOOK5809 says:
02/13/09 08:16AM
Good post man. I cant believe it has not been legalized yet. We can go dump tons of cash on the horses or greyhounds and even casinos but no sports. I think it will happen soon so they can tax it and get their cut because they know we are gonna play somewhere so why not get their cut and help the economy.
Gambleholic says:
02/13/09 08:44AM
I cant believe the focking government would not want action on sports betting with the way the economy is.  Same with the legalization of marijuana.  Those two things are in the hands of the underground figures in the USA, and it's the shady figures profiting from it.  How stupid can our government be???

I am not hating on the shady figures but instead them

Fathomable says:
02/25/09 05:10AM
I agree Gambleholic. We could actually pay off the national debt with the tax revenue from those two things. This is the FUTURE!
goinggone says:
03/04/09 01:49PM
There is a reason why it is not legal yet.

Money has got to be spread around in the right places.

Add your response:
Please note that the blogger has the option of reviewing all comments before they are displayed to the public. Your comment may not be published immediately.
 
Advertisement