One of the trusted truisms of modern business is that the casino and
gambling industries don't suffer the same fluctuations as the general
business community.
When the economic cycle goes into a downswing, so the theory goes,
people still need the psychological release that comes with gambling.
In short, people who like to gamble will gamble. I even saw a stat once
that indicated that lottery revenues actually increase during
recessions, but I can't find that link now.
Sure, there might be a small decrease in the amounts people gamble
during tough times, but in general they still like to keep their hands
in the game. Hence the term "recession-proof".
Or so the theory goes - until now.
The Nevada Gaming Control Board last week released its monthly
figures for February. The kind folks at the Las Vegas Review-Journal
posted them the other day, and they weren't pretty.
The article explains the many ways February seemingly lined up
perfectly for maximum revenue potential, yet it still saw the Vegas
strip casinos experience a three percent drop in gaming win revenue
from last February.
Ouch! Or as the article says, "OK, now it's time to panic."
It is now becoming glaringly obvious that the current recessing economy is undoubtedly being felt in Sin City.
The question is, "If recessions haven't hurt Vegas before, why now?"
Personally, I think there are lots of reasons why this recession's
affect on the gambling industry - especially Las Vegas - could be very
different from previous economic slowdowns. But first you have to look
back at previous recessions, and how Las Vegas fended them off.
For one thing, Vegas only really became a gambling destination in
the 40's and so the novelty plus the lure of the Rat Pack in the 50's
was more than enough to offset the mild recessions of the mid-1950s.
During the oil shortage of the 70's the mob still had its hooks in
the city, which kept profits artificially high - and Las Vegas was
still catering to the degenerate crowd that was going to Vegas
expecting to strike it rich. Those are the very people who lose the
most. It was probably around this time that the "recession-proof"
theory started to take hold.
During the 80's and 90's Vegas was transforming itself into a family
vacation destination and catering to a whole new demographic (ie.
yuppies and boomers) that was eager to experience Vegas (and casino
gambling in general) for the first time. We forget that it has only
been in the last 15-20 years that casinos have proliferated the
continent. For millions of Americans, for most of their lives the only
way they could experience a casino was to travel to Las Vegas. Either
way, the recreational gambler was born as a target demographic. This increase in market size was more than enough to
offset any general economic crises during this period.
Finally, the "recession" that happened earlier this decade wasn't
even a recession by a lot of standards. And it certainly wasn't serious
enough to affect the newest generation of Americans who had grown up
with gambling and saw nothing morally wrong with going to the casino and losing a few bucks as part of an evening's activities.
So what is different about this recession?
Simple. Competition, stagnation, and the downside of recreational gambling.
The Las Vegas target market is changing too. They have grown up
being able to regularly travel to a local casino to play blackjack or
poker. With casinos available in virtually every state, there is no
need for Americans to waste valuable dollars on stuff like airfare and
accommodations as part of an expensive trip to Vegas, when they can get
90% of the thrill for the price of a cab fare. Maybe it's not the same
as the real thing, but it's a lot more cost effective. Sure, they like
being able to walk down the Strip with a beer in their hand, but after
they've done that trip a couple of times, well, now it just seems kind
of tired and not really worth going into debt over - not when they are worrying about their next mortgage payment.
As well, the latest generation in the Vegas demographic is a LOT
less hypnotized by the glitz and glamor of Las Vegas. The lure of
celebrities isn't quite the same when you regularly get bombarded by
images of somebody's famous crotch or Britney's latest public
humiliation - or most likely both simultaneously.
Finally, there is the fact that gambling revenues have grown so much
in recent years because of the growing acceptance of the idea of
recreational gambling. Gambling for fun is harmless, and as American
society came to accept this fact, more and more Americans were free to
gamble without feeling stigmatized. It is probably the greatest success
of the modern casino marketing industry that they were able to so
effectively change the perception of gambling in the American psyche.
But it is a mature market now, and the downside of relying upon
recreational gamblers for the bulk of your profits is that recreational
gamblers, by their very definition, only gamble for fun - and they
don't gamble what they can't afford. When times get financially tough
for the purely recreational gambler, they will decide that they
actually can not afford to go to the casino tonight.
Really, all of this underscores a reality that should be construed as a positive. The
fact that the gambling industry is no longer recession-proof, is proof
that gamblers are no longer all degenerates, and actually are regular
people who know how to make smart financial decisions.
Wrapping up
But don't worry about Las Vegas, they still made
literally hundreds of millions of dollars in February. And once the
economy turns around, they'll start seeing profits increase again.
My only worry is the parallels I see between the obsolete traditional land-based casino industry and the recording industry.
About a decade ago the recording industry, which had grown very fat
and complacent, began having its profits eaten by modern technology.
Rather than changing their business model to suit the times, the RIAA
instead wrote a textbook on how not to handle a situation wisely. A
decade later, the recording industry is in ruins, and they missed out
on a huge opportunity and gave it all to iTunes.
Similarly, the traditional land-based casino industry has grown very
rich, fat and complacent, and is about to be thrust into an unfamiliar
situation where profits stop rising. And again, there is a modern
technological competitor in online gambling that can be viewed as the
scapegoat or a saviour. The traditional industry has a chance to
embrace the future and the idea of online gambling. Instead the
traditional industry, as evidenced by the actions - or lack thereof -
of the American Gaming Association (AGA) may be following the
disastrous path of the RIAA and trying to hamper the growth of online
gambling.
Let's hope they smarten up.