http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/11/woman-charged-sex-with-boy.html
Some ugly 43 year old had sex with a preteen. I’m not sure what you are celebrating.
I could understand that sentiment if this was an attractive (or at least average looking) 20-35 year old woman having sex with a 16+ year old student.
You, however, are applauding an ugly 43 year old having sex with a child that’s not even old enough to be a teenager.
I gave you the benefit of the doubt that maybe you were just missing something, but it’s obvious you didn’t.
You saw a story where an ugly 43 year old raped a child not even old enough to be a teenager and, for reasons I don’t even want to think about, that gives you cause to celebrate.
I really hope this is just a poor attempt at humor because if it’s not you are seriously fucked in the head.
Who’s overwhelmed? I’m simply pointing out that anyone who becomes happy at the idea of 40 year olds raping children not even old enough to be teenagers is seriously fucked in the head.
You can try to spin this anyway you like, but the fact remains that you read a story in which a 43 year old raped a child not even old enough to be a teenager and you got some kind of joy out of it.
It’s not difficult to ascertain the type of person that would get joy out of a child being raped.
Yes, that is just wrong in so many ways. At least wait till the boy is ready to graduate high school.
You get joy out of reading stories where 40 year olds rape children not old enough to be teenagers. It’s pretty obvious who the nut job is.
It’s clear the type of person you are and I just hope you don’t hurt any more children.
Wow, you lost your virginity at 17. Congratulations. You must be very proud of yourself.
So it’s ok for adults to rape 12 year old children?
I knew there were a lot of sick fucks on covers, but I didn’t know there were this many vocal supporters of pedophilia.
Agreed. But if nothing else at least this thread has brought to light a few pedophilia supporters covers has.
It’s amazing how there are people here so fucked in the head that they get joy out of reading stories where 40 year olds rape children not old enough to be teenagers. What’s more is they seem to be proud of it.
Hopefully the police in their communities are aware of them. They should decrease the chances they can hurt any more children.
You can attempt to spin it anyway you like, but the fact remains that you get joy out of reading about 40+ year olds raping children not old enough to be teenagers.
It’s not difficult to ascertain the type of person you are.
I wouldn’t have been all that surprised if there was one pedophilia enthusiast on Covers coming out to support child rape, but there have been at least 3 in this thread.
They have said that raping 12 year olds is ok because “12 is the new 18.” They also said that 40+ year olds that rape children not even old enough to be teenagers should not only receive no jail time, but they shouldn’t even be put on a sexual predators list. Who else but someone who did something similar or wants to do something similar would say such a fucked up thing?
It seems more and more likely that they are trying to justify the horrible things they have done in their past. They can’t accept that raping children is wrong. I just hope the police stop them before they can hurt anymore children.
Nice edit job, Chester. However unlike you and your fellow NAMBLA buddies I wouldn’t rape any children. It’s pretty obvious from the entire post that it means I could understand you and your fellow pedophilia enthusiasts finding excitement, joy, and amusement from a story involving a 17, 16, or 15 year old… MAYBE even a 14 year old.
I wouldn’t necessarily agree with it (especially the 14 year old), but I could understand it.
However, I don’t understand grown men (presumably) getting excitement, joy, and amusement from reading about a preteen getting raped unless they are pedophiles.
I don’t understand how anyone except pedophiles could claim raping 12 year olds is ok because “12 is the new 18.”
And I think most people would agree that anyone who claims 40+ year olds that rape children not even hold enough to be teenagers should not only receive no jail time, but should not even be put on a sexual predators list is a pedophile or at the very least extremely fucked up.
It’s clear you have a sickness and I hope you get help.
RIF
I’m not sure if you are intentionally making things up or you are just a few cards shy of a full deck. Either way, that’s not what I said at all.
I said I could understand some of the reactions made in this thread if the kid was 17, 16, 15, or MAYBE even 14. I wouldn’t necessarily agree with them (especially if he was 14 years old), but I could understand them.
I don’t understand how anyone except a pedophile could think that 40+ year olds who rape preteens should not only receive no jail time, but they shouldn’t even be put on a sexual predators list.
Maybe you do, but most decent people don’t.
It means I wouldn’t condone the story if the boy had been a few days from his 15th birthday, but I wouldn’t be as appalled by some of the comments made in this thread as I am with the boy being a preteen.
There is no grey area with a child not even old enough to be a teenager. The only people that think it’s perfectly fine to rape children are pedophiles. And it looks like we might have more than one in this thread.
Please quote where I said you thought this was okay in any manner.
Did you say anything along the lines of “it’s ok to rape 12 year olds because 12 is the new 18” and “40+ year olds that rape preteens not only should receive no jail time, but they shouldn’t even be put on a sexual predators watch list"?
I was talking about the sick fucks that said things like that. IIRC, you didn’t anything like that so, no, I wasn't talking about you.
Whether or not you let your child hang out around a “fucken pervert” is your decision.
Anyone who says things like “it’s ok to rape 12 year olds because 12 is the new 18” and “40+ year olds that rape preteens not only should receive no jail time, but they shouldn’t even be put on a sexual predators watch list” is a sick and twisted fuck and maybe even a pedophile.
You will not convince me otherwise.
Sportsgamster has only been a member here a few days and he made a beeline for this thread to defend pedophiles claiming not only should people that rape preteens receive no jail time, but they shouldn’t even be put on a sexual predators list.
Looks like he might be APKKK version 2.0
Yup, when a pedophilia enthusiast like sportsgamster doesn’t think 40+ year olds who rape children not even old enough to be teenagers should go to jail or even be put on a sexual predators list it’s pretty obvious what’s in their hearts.
If they haven’t hurt children already it’s probably only a matter of time before they do.
Feel free to point out where I said there was "a huge difference.”
Or you’ll do what? Tell us again that it’s ok for 40+ year olds to bang 12 year olds because “12 is the new 18”?
Seems more like you are trying to convince yourself of that than trying to convince anyone else. Hmm, I wonder why that would be.
That means a lot coming from the pedophilia enthusiast that admits he doesn’t think 40+ year olds who rape children not even old enough to be teenagers should go to jail or even be put on a sexual predators list.
It’s pretty obvious you are trying to justify to yourself that the horrible things you’ve done aren’t wrong and are not worthy of punishment.
You’re ignoring me sure didn’t last long. I guess you just can’t resist talking about “fantasizing about pedophilia,” “kiddie porn,” “young boys,” “rape,” and “getting hard.”
Get help sicko.
I disagree, crusher. If this was about a 17, 16, 15, or maybe even a 14 year old I could see that. However, this is about a child not even old enough to be a teenager.
Anyone who gets pleasure, joy, amusement, or excitement from reading stories where children not old enough to be teenagers are raped has some serious issues. Maybe they aren’t child predators. But I wouldn’t be surprised if at the very least they had some kiddy porn on their computers.
Wow, a pedophilia enthusiast doesn’t think 40+ year olds who rape children not even old enough to be teenagers should go to jail or even be put on a sexual predators list.
How shocking.
So because you like to think of youself as the Hugh Hefner of elementary school it’s ok for children under the age of 13 to get raped as long as they don’t have “a dildo shoved up their a-hole against their will”?
Wow.
You do realize how easy it is for people to look up the posts you make on message boards, right?
So when you inevitably get picked up for being a diddler the prosecution in your trial is going to see all the sick shit you’ve been saying.
Enjoy prison, pervert. I hear pedophiles are very “popular” there.
Be sure to tell the judge at your trial that you didn’t rape children because the children wanted to be raped by you. I’m sure the judge will let you off with just a warning.
The fact that you keep trying to justify the rape of children under the age of 13 shows the type of person you are. It also shows you are most likely trying to justify something that you’ve done or something that you want to do. You truly are a sick fuck and I hope you are stopped before you can hurt more children.
The fact that not only do you condone the rape of children, but you actually encourage it speaks volumes about the type of person you are and what you have probably done in the past.
Point out where I said anyone was going to jail simply for posting in this thread.
You and your fellow pedophilia enthusiast can attempt to justify the rape of children as much as you like, but it doesn’t change the fact that it’s wrong.
In the post you quoted I was quoting someone else so I have no idea why you think that was directed towards you.
So when it’s someone else’s preteen family member getting raped you find it “amusing,” but when it’s your preteen family member (I’m assuming) getting raped you would “beat some pedophile ass.”
You sound like a standup guy.
Yup, sportsgamster is just another loudmouth dumbass noob exposing how idiotic he is with every post he makes.
You admit to finding the rape of preteens “amusing” and you can’t figure out why decent people might take issue with that?
Guys that sound like they are both members of NAMBLA agreeing with each other. How shocking.
The fact that you think children not old enough to be preteens getting raped by 40+ year olds is simply consenting adults having sex shows how fucked up you are.
It seems like you are trying way too hard to justify horrible things you have done in the past. Hopefully the fact that you obviously feel guilty about it will prevent you from doing it again, but I doubt it.
Child predators almost never change.
OMG. This might just be the most disturbing post ever on Covers. I feel sorry for your kids.
Sorry, I have 2 kids of my own and I guarantee you I would not be sending them to Hooters with a known pervert. I guess my reality doesn't involve purposely exposing my kids to scumbags.
Says a lot about you as a parent.
Let’s ignore him. He hates guys who have sex with women. I just figured
it out. It’s jealousy my fellow posters. Your avatar has women kissing
and he hates that he has never done that before. 2169 thinks getting
laid at a young age as a boy is awesome as well as i and it pisses him
off that he has never even had a girlfriend or did anything with a girl as a kid.
He’s one of those male feminists, a boy with female views,
feminine characteristics, and feminine qualities. If the boy was an infant and the women
was trying sexual things, that would make her a pedophile. He was 12
years old not an infant! If we were on the streets and a crazy weirdo
man created an argument with one of us, we would ignore it and just move
along. But on the Internet, you can hide behind a screen and people
don’t know if you’re crazy till it’s too late and you have had a long
crazy argument. Let’s stop responding because the mods might BAN us because of this freak. I apologize mods for having to read this craziness.
I'm done.
whoa, this thread is hardcore