Josh_Nagel's Blog

Top 5 Myths in College Football

By Josh_Nagel | View all Posts
Posted Friday, September 16, 2011 03:03 PM   14 comments

While I am thinking of it, I’d like to dispute a few myths that have reared their ugly heads early in this college football season. For whatever reasons, the vast majority of college football observers seem to believe these to be true, despite strong evidence that suggests otherwise.

Without wasting any more space in introductions, here are the Top 5 pervading myths in college football and why they are not true:

1) Oregon State’s Mike Riley is a “great” coach. How do you figure? Riley is nice to the media and smiles easily, so the media showers him with adulation in return. Whenever the Beavers are mentioned, commentators never miss a chance to tell you what an awesome coach they have.

The Riley cheerleading is getting old. The bottom line is, his teams rise up and win a game they aren’t supposed to win once a while – the USC upset of a few years ago comes to mind -- but they also lose far too many games that they are supposed to win. His 2009 team that went 8-5 had the talent go 11-2 but came up way short of its potential. Riley is 69-56 (55 percent) at Oregon State and hit a new low by losing to Sacramento State in the season-opener. Last week’s 35-0 humiliation at Wisconsin was supposed to be the type of game for which the Beavers give an inspired performance; they aren’t even doing that anymore. 

2) Georgia’s Mark Richt is a “bad” coach. The idea that Richt needs to start keeping an eye on his inbox for the pink slip that might be delivered is baffling. He took over the program a decade ago and immediately changed its fortunes for the better. Richt is 96-36 (73 percent) at Georgia, 7-3 in bowl games and 2-1 in BCS bowls. You’d think a 6-7 season mired in injuries and suspensions wouldn’t be the death knell of his career.

It’s understood that Georgia is 0-2. There aren’t a whole lot of teams in the country that wouldn’t have that record after facing Boise State and South Carolina. Georgia would have beaten the Gamecocks by three scores if quarterback Aaron Murray hadn’t gift-wrapped the game for them. Richt can still coach and he can still recruit, as freshman running back Isaiah Crowell proves. Cut Richt some slack. 


3) Notre Dame is on the brink of greatness. What I wouldn’t pay to see ESPN hit a permanent mute button on the ubiquitous, senile, in-studio Notre Dame mascot Lou Holtz. At first, his non-stop homerism was sort of charming. Now, it’s pathetic. His Notre Dame ramblings fill up way too much of the airwaves, and he’d have you believe that Notre Dame’s 0-2 start is somehow going to end in a 12-0 finish and BCS title bid.  

The Irish are 43-34 since 2005 and likely headed toward a 7-5ish year. There’s no crime in that record, but never has a mediocre program been so widely hailed as something else. How Dayne Crist allegedly beat out Tommy Rees in spring practice, I’ll never know. Rees was the reason the Irish ended last year on a three-game win streak and had deserved optimism heading into this season. Starting Crist was coach Brian Kelly’s first mistake; believing the media’s hype of his team was the second.

4) All the new uniforms are cool. They say if you look good, you feel good. Well, most of the new college football uniforms look bad. The last thing we need is a constant reminder of just how influential The Giant Shoe Company and The Really Big Gear Company are on the game.

I liked the comment last week from the TV broadcaster who noted Penn State’s and Alabama’s jerseys weren’t flashy, but, “When you turn on the TV, at least you know who’s playing.”

5) Taking the ball last in overtime is the “correct” strategy. This has to be most back-ass-ward line of thinking I have ever heard. To wit: “That way, you know exactly what you need to get!”

Since when was this pressure a good thing? How about putting 7 points on the board and forcing your opponent into a do-or-die situation? In poker, chess and even Scrabble, the idea of staying on the attack and forcing your opponent into pressure situations seems to work. Taking the ball second is meek, and puts you in the position of reaction instead of taking action.

Most NFL coaches (except Marty Mornhinweg) take the ball if they win the overtime toss. I realize the NFL uses sudden-death overtime, but I’m just stunned college football coaches don’t see the merit in striking first. I fully intend to celebrate the first time I see a college team choose offense when it wins the overtime toss.

Hopefully, it’s soon.  

14 comments
comment Post A Comment
joewashington says:
09/16/11 03:31PM

6. Myth: That FSU even has a heartbeat of a chance against OU Saturday...Sooners will go 6-0 vs FSU since 1976....

Louis51 says:
09/16/11 03:36PM
These are not myths they are your opinions. Big Foot is a myth.
jakas75 says:
09/16/11 03:41PM

3) Notre Dame is on the brink of greatness. What I wouldn’t pay to see ESPN hit a permanent mute button on the ubiquitous, senile, in-studio Notre Dame mascot Lou Holtz. At first, his non-stop homerism was sort of charming. Now, it’s pathetic. His Notre Dame ramblings fill up way too much of the airwaves, and he’d have you believe that Notre Dame’s 0-2 start is somehow going to end in a 12-0 finish and BCS title bid.  

The Irish are 43-34 since 2005 and likely headed toward a 7-5ish year. There’s no crime in that record, but never has a mediocre program been so widely hailed as something else. How Dayne Crist allegedly beat out Tommy Rees in spring practice, I’ll never know. Rees was the reason the Irish ended last year on a three-game win streak and had deserved optimism heading into this season. Starting Crist was coach Brian Kelly’s first mistake; believing the media’s hype of his team was the second.



Love it... couldn't agree with you more....

RJSizzle says:
09/16/11 03:55PM
#1 and #2 are fantastic


MaineRoad says:
09/16/11 03:57PM

I basically agree with 2,3 and 4, though I don't live in the ghetto, so I've never actually heard anyone say the new uniforms were cool.

On #1, I tihnk Riley is a good fit for that program. Not sure I've ever heard him described as a "great coach," but maybe I haven't been paying enough attention.

#5 is so stupid I won't waste additional keystrokes explaining why.

daytonavol says:
09/16/11 03:59PM
 #2  could also be called the Phil Fulmer rule.....it is a what have you done for me lately biz....
thorpe says:
09/16/11 04:06PM
Maybe you are too young to remember what Oregon St football was like before Riley coached them (28 straight seasons with a record below .500).  He is 5-1 in bowls as a head coach.  In his second stint with Ore St, he has had 2 losing seasons out of 8.  He was a lousy NFL coach.
bookieassassin says:
09/16/11 04:17PM


.....yeah just a simple opinion....I do like your style though....assuming your opinion is fact....and the opposite therefore must be "myth"....greatness

a myth....might be along the lines of...."the team that runs the ball the best will win".....(esp in NFL)

all these guys can coach....those familiar with the situation at Oregon St...little cash > poor facilities
say he's doing a tremendous job
    *most any school would hire Riley (not mentioned much because they know he's not leaving)

*NOTE > one measure of a coach.....do his teams IMPROVE....as the season progresses.....or stay the same or maybe get worse?...
Beavs almost always get better.....markedly so

because at 1st the athletic ability dominates..(reason why betting favorites early works).....coaching has a greater influence of course as the year wears on....
Josh_Nagel says:
09/16/11 04:32PM
Thorpe, glad you mentioned Riley's bowl record because I meant to but it got left out. Obviously, 5-1 in bowls is very good, but I do feel as though his teams have underachieved in the past several years. Bookie, I'd say his teams used to improve by year's end, but that hasn't been the case in the past couple seasons.

MaineRoad, I like the case I make for No. 5. Teams that score first still win a higher percentage of games. I don't have the figures, but why shouldn't the same be true of overtime? I've seen plenty of teams that take the ball last have the behind-the-8-ball look about them when they are down 7.

GL to all.

TRAIN69 says:
09/16/11 05:38PM

So the opposite would be a fact? Myth? Your point is illogical.

Some people claim to have seen Big Foot. So you thinking its a myth is just your opinion.

Comprende?

Amp says:
09/17/11 10:38AM
#5 Makes no sense, sure the mental aspect of it comes into play, but you know exactly what you need if you're on 4th down. You want to know the reason college coaches don't take the ball first? Cause its the wrong move, but I guess you're smarter than all of them right?
tallguyindc says:
09/18/11 02:31AM
You are absolutely wrong about #5.

Have you ever seen a team kick a field goal on fourth down in OT if the other team already scored a touchdown?

Of course not.

Have you ever seen a team kick a field goal on fourth down and then have the other team score a touchdown?

Of course.

Bottom line: The team that goes first will always be at a disadvantage when making the fourth down call. That puts them at a disadvantage overall. Go ahead and look up the stats and you'll see that the team that goes last in OT has a huge advantage.

Obviously, this doesn't apply in the NFL and NFL coaches have a huge advantage in going first.

Cdub03 says:
09/20/11 02:28AM
Just to add to tallguys view which i agree with.....

If you take the ball first in NCAAFB and you score you take the 2 point conversion away from your choices as well... At that point you kick the extra point..... The team that gets the ball second if they score has the added option of going for two to win the game if the choose too...

Josh_Nagel says:
09/20/11 01:30PM
Train, the second entry from Merriam-Webster for myth, after the one that refers to mythical figures like Big Foot, reads, "A popular tradition or belief that has grown up around something or someone." So, if there's a perception that Mark Richt is a poor coach but isn't based on facts, then this, by definition, is a myth. It's also the most frequently used form of the word in modern society. If I told you Larry Fitzgerald made a "sick" catch, would you consider it a medical diagnosis?

Tallguy, cdub, I seer your points, and I realize most coaches are playing the percentages. But I still think there's some merit to my take. Think about some high-scoring teams, like Texas Tech of a few years ago or Oklahoma State now, when they are in one of those games where it seems like they score on every possession but can't stop the opposition, either. Wouldn't it make sense for one of those clubs to just put 7 points on the board first, instead of knowing they likely will have to get a touchdown if they go on defense first? It's worth considering. GL to you guys.

Add your response:
Please note that the blogger has the option of reviewing all comments before they are displayed to the public. Your comment may not be published immediately.
 
Advertisement