KingScorpio's Blog
Posted Wednesday, March 03, 2010 05:18 PM
Am i wrong for wanting to POUND them today ????
Why are people even thinking about betting on the NYK's ????
Replies are most welcome
Posted Tuesday, March 02, 2010 03:27 AM
MON/BOS un 5 +100
OTT/NYR un 5 +110
STL/PHX ov 5 -130
GL
Posted Saturday, February 27, 2010 02:31 AM
Biringham's failure to score goals at home - 12 goals in 13 games
Birmingham's 3-2 on the road over Wigan on Dec 5th
With Wigan fighing off regulation and getting slaughtered on the road this season,Birmingham laying only .5 at almost even money (-105) seems like a losing bet to me.
Birmingham has only 2 losses at home this year,now they face a team that's giving up 34 goals on the road and a win against them at home will cost you nothing.
Wigan's back is against the wall here,and Birmingham has nothing to fear sitting in 10th position.
With Birmingham's lack of offense at home and Wigan's desire to stay afloat in the EPL,this looks to be a great spot to take the hungry shitty team trying to end a 6 game losing streak.
Last thing to think of before betting this game,with all we know about these 2 teams
Why isn't the line Birmingham -.5 -135 to 145 if not higher ????
Wigan Athletic +.5 -115
GL
Posted Wednesday, February 24, 2010 12:03 PM
Chelsea is the better team
Inter Milan's goalkeeper was in a car accident on Sunday
The world hates Mourinho and want to see him fail
As stated in another post this game is about HONOR
Chelsea will play not to be embarassed by Morno
Morno will have his squad playing to kill
Both sides will tell you a DRAW is fine with them,but only Chelsea would be telling the truth here.
Getting Chelsea at PK +100 when the other team's goalkeeper's health is in question and Chelsea's clearly the better team makes this a losing bet.
Inter Milan PK
GL
Posted Wednesday, February 10, 2010 01:33 PM
Aston Villa +.5 +105
West Ham -.5 +120
Wolverhampton +.5 +115
GL
Posted Friday, February 05, 2010 09:28 PM
EVERTON/LIVERPOOL - Everton +.5 -105
FULHAM/BOLTON - Bolton -.5 +115
WEST HAM/BRUNLEY - West Ham PK +105
MAN CITY/HULL CITY - Hull City +.5 +115
PORTSMOUTH/MAN UTD - Man Utd -2 -140
BLACKBURN/STOKE CITY - Blackburn +.5 -145
WIGAN/SUNDERLAND - Sunderland -.5 +105
ASTON/VILLA/TOTTENHAM - Aston Villa + .5 -125
GL
Posted Friday, February 05, 2010 01:53 PM
No Ivan for ATL and WSH has won 12 in a row
-300 seems like a sure thing and probably is at that price but -1.5 -110 doesn't
Thinking of just playing the +1.5 on ATL -110 because Vegas isn't going to let you get rich on PAYDAY
ATL pl +1.5 -110
Tell me your thoughts and angles on this game today
Posted Wednesday, January 27, 2010 09:52 PM
OTT ml +144
Posted Monday, January 25, 2010 12:47 PM
Posted Sunday, January 24, 2010 01:29 PM
Just the way it goes with the Vikings and Brett Favre
Vikings won't win because HOLLYWOOD doesn't get a say in the matter.
Desmond Howard won the SB for the Packers,not Brett
I'm a lifelong Vikings fan and know a letdown when i see it.
Brett throwing INT's and Peterson fumbling in his effort to gain 1 extra yard.
N.O. by 5 or more
GL
Posted Thursday, January 07, 2010 07:12 PM
Think Alabama wins and covers the game,but just betting this prop.
GL
Posted Thursday, December 24, 2009 04:10 PM
SMU 7-5 vs. NEV 8-4
-14 on Nevada is the biggest spread of all the bowl games
Now some bullshit about suspensions and starters not playing only add to the frenzy.
Today's game will feature 2 shitty defenses.
NEV facing June Jones run and gun upstart Mustangs and SMU facing the run happy Wolfpack.
The suspensions mean nothing because the kids replacing them are motivated for the chance to play and shine.
If the suspension really mattered Vegas would pull the game off the board,but instead lets the goofy public slit their own throats thinking they know better.
Laying DD's when your team has a shitty defense is always dangerous,which is why NEV should cover.Because there's RISK in that bet.
Getting DD's while playing a shitty defense and that team has player suspensions only sets up false hopes.There's NO RISK betting here,therefore should be a losing bet.
So i'll lay the biggest spread on the board in a game that looks almost equal when looking at the overall records.
NEV -14 or more
GL
Posted Monday, December 21, 2009 01:04 PM
While writing down line movements on today's sheet at the casino that what i hear sold.
Still might be going on as i left to return home to post this
Posted Sunday, December 20, 2009 12:41 AM
These fuckers just always find a way to win. They can score at will and play defense when needed.
That's worth putting your money on everyday,even at high juice.
CHI and VAN almost made the list but they disappear on the road.
The other teams are really hit or miss and aren't really worth risking your money at any price.
That's the way i'm seeing this season playout now.
Posted Sunday, December 20, 2009 12:13 AM
435-407-16 ats on sides so far this year
Spending 5 to 10 seconds per game capping
Davidson +7
Rhode Island -11
CONN -19
Hofstra +7
Iowa State -8
Arkansas State -3.5
North Texas -15.5
Fla State +6.5
Wake Forest -9.5
No lines yet on other games but would lean on these
SD
SF
N. Arizona
GL
Posted Saturday, December 19, 2009 05:59 PM
If it truly mattered the Wild would've asked the league for a postponement.IMO
MIN has been playing well lately as have OTT
Game truly is a PK'em
New goalie might be the bomb,who are we to know.
I'll side with the better defense that's been playing well and take my chances the kid still does GREAT tonight.
MIN ml -105
GL
Posted Tuesday, December 08, 2009 07:26 PM
No lines yet but these look to be underestimated.IMO
St Joesph's
San Diego
Tennesee-Martin
Posted Tuesday, December 08, 2009 06:33 PM
TCU +2.5
XAV/KST un 148
GL
Posted Monday, November 30, 2009 06:15 PM
You keep betting against the Colts and now you're betting against the Saints.
You don't get a GOLD star pinned to your chest if you're right.
So why would you risk your money in a situation where you're so likely to lose ????
Posted Sunday, November 29, 2009 01:25 AM
CHI +10.5
Monsters of the midway rivalry here. Doesn't matter if one teams bad and the others great,they'll play tooth and nail against each other.So getting DD's almost makes me laugh.Guess that's the tax for having Favre,Peterson and home field advantage.While the Vikings are coasting to their predestined Super Bowl apperance,the Bears have faded into the swamps of mediocrity losing 5 of their last 6.Which brings them into this game under the radar of the common bettor.I'll take the points here.
SEA/STL ov 42
Rematch of their earlier game at Seattle in September when SEA won 28-0 with a line of 41.Sunday in St. Louis the total is 42.While both teams combined scoring average is only 31 points,i expect a different story this Sunday.I'll fade the "Captain Obvious" under play here and make the harder bet taking the over 42 with two dismal teams with nothing to play for.
GL
Posted Thursday, November 26, 2009 11:11 PM
Here's my plan of attack
114 - Louisville +3
122 - Ohio +2.5
127 - ILL/CINN un 57.5
133 - N.ILL/C.MICH un 51
117 - BUF -3
120 - Col St -3
129 - NEB/COL un 40
112 - West Virginia +1
GL
Posted Wednesday, November 25, 2009 02:14 PM
You have the 22nd ranked 4-1 Maryland vs. 3-1 Wisconsin at PK
Maryland has only played 1 decent team (CINN) and lost that game.
Wisconsin has played 2 decent teams (ARZ and GONZ) beating ARZ and losing last night to the Zags.
Point is - Ranked teams are OVERVALUED and have little truth to their rankings.
Line opens at PK and the fool will back the RANKED team.
Pick - WISC +2
GL
Posted Sunday, November 22, 2009 12:55 AM
UCRIV -1
KANST -1
DAV +1
MIAFL +1
GL
Posted Saturday, November 21, 2009 04:15 AM
MON -10.5 and UN 52.5
CAL +3 and OV 54.5
GL
Posted Saturday, November 21, 2009 03:29 AM
Purdue -3
Michigan State +3
Marshall -3
San Jose State +3
GL