Michaelperry's Blog

Baseball Needs More Instant Replay

By Michaelperry | View all Posts
Posted Wednesday, October 14, 2009 12:22 AM   3 comments
After seeing left-field umpire Phil Cuzzi call a ball that was a half a foot fair at a critical juncture of the ALDS game between the Twins and Yankees I can see why Twins manager Ron Gardenhire asked the media "We had six umpires out there. I think, right, six? Six umpires."  The reason Gardenhire stressed six, is that during the regular season, there are four umpires instead of six. But increasing the amount of humans from four to six, isn't going to solve missed calls like this, because of the "human" element just mentioned.

I know I have chimed in on this topic before, clamoring for baseball to be more extensive as to what exactly what is subject to instant replay, but I feel strongly about this and want to see baseball address this issue. I mean these guys play 162 fricken games a year, and then some guy totally messes up a call in the 11th inning of a playoff game. If this was an NFL game, the call on the field would have been amended and justice would have been served.

I have a suggestion regarding instant replay: Give the manager one opportunity to challenge ANY, yes any call on the field. Baseball games in the 00's take an hour longer than they did in the 80's, so whats an extra couple minutes of action due to instant replay? At least we know you will never go away saying "I cant believe we lost because of that awful call".

What do you think about baseball giving each manager one chance to challenge any call and using Instant Replay as a result? Please put your comments down below. Thanks
3 comments
comment Post A Comment
howzuck says:
10/14/09 04:42PM
I suppose the "indisputable evidence" phrase the NFL uses would be used to overturn calls. I don't think you should be able to challenge balls and strikes or so-called judgement calls (ex. fan interference or check-swings). Also, if a team was successful with their one challenge, would they be allowed another? What if a call was botched later on?
bogey533 says:
10/14/09 07:10PM
Yes definately and if correct receive another challenge. I would like to know what the difference between a ball being hit for a homerun vs a ball or play the might decide a ballgame. I agree 162 or in this case 163 games 6 not 4 umpires 20 feet away facing the ball the outfielder and the foul line and not only does the ball hit the outfielders glove clearly in fair ground but after that hits the ground leaves an inditation of a ball mark clearly in fair ground. Last lets not forget Mr. Cuzzi's failure to perform his job the head umpire clearly states he made a error but lets him continue to umpire in the same series and not even suspend him amazing.
Michaelperry says:
10/14/09 10:04PM
Time for Selig and his boys to get with the times and implement an instant replay where both managers have at least one opportunity to challenge any play.
Add your response:
Please note that the blogger has the option of reviewing all comments before they are displayed to the public. Your comment may not be published immediately.
 
Advertisement