Posted Tuesday, May 08, 2012 11:43 AM
He didn't average two carries per game last year but the NFL Network show on the best 100 Players of 2012 has him listed at 95 or something.
They say the players voted on the list, but how did they do this? I'm sure it wasn't what you'd call a method that would produce "accurate" results. I would bet on it.
I'm sure John Kuhn has the respect of many peers. But he is not one of the top 100 best players in the NFL. Period.
And I really don't expect any replies to my post, because who really cares?
Furthermore (and more importantly), how can you make a list pertaining to something that hasn't even happened yet? The top 100 players of 2012 have to be determined after seeing what they do in 2012. I thought this was common fucking sense but what do I know?
Wow. I'm starting to think that the NFL really is run by a bunch of idiots. So maybe Goodell is rubbing off on everybody.
Posted Monday, September 07, 2009 08:40 AM
I'm sorry but he is way underrated this year. And IMO, there's no way people should be drafting all these backs before him... Forte, Jones-Drew, Slaton, Gore, Chris Johnson. I can see A.P. and even Steven Jackson and DeAngelo Williams. But that's about it. LT is still one of the top 3 to 4 backs in the league and he will prove it this year. People thought I was crazy for picking him 3rd after AP and Jones-Drew. I mean one guy even said something like... "Man he's way down there!" And someone else said something about me not taking Forte. Sorry but LT wouldn't have been around for my next pick. And he'll do alot more damage this year than Forte will. Bank on it. LT is not getting near the respect he should because he had an average year last year and alot of people are going to regret passing on him in favor of these other guys.
The thing is, LT is a great back. And great backs dont just fade into oblivion at the age of 30. Look at the numbers Emmitt Smith had in his ninth year. Walter Payton posted huge numbers in his 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th year. Barry Sanders ran for over 2,000 yards in his ninth season. And his 10th year saw 1,491 yds. So my point is this: LT still has alot of great football left in him. You watch. Just don't be shocked when it happens. ... [More]
Posted Sunday, July 26, 2009 08:03 AM
In your opinion, who is the better quarterback? Your choices are Terry in his prime or Ben Roethlisberger... I was sitting with some of my friends, all Steeler fans, and our answer was unanimous. And we know our football. We've been fans for 30+ years.
So who's your choice? We all said Ben. Terry was terrible at first, and then he became a Hall of Fame quarterback after struggling for 4-5 years. But who is/was the better QB? I know some of you will think I'm nuts. Some will agree. But that's what my friends and I believe.
Posted Wednesday, July 15, 2009 09:46 AM
Let's say you're putting together a team. You don't yet know what kind of offense or defense you're going to run because you haven't picked any coordinators yet. That said, you still may already know what you're going to want to run. However, for your first WR pick, you must pick Hines Ward or T.O. And you cant pick the other one later. Who do you pick?
I'm taking HInes because A: I don't respect T.O. as a team player that much and I think he's a cancer. There are, no kidding, probably 30 receivers I would take before him. B: Hines Ward is a throwback. A team player. And he's got heart. Not to mention loads of talent. C: Terrell does have a couple years on Hines.
I'm really curious as to what the Covers people think on this. I'm expecting T.O. to get more votes for some reason. It should be interesting...
Stats for reference...
T.O. 0... [More]
Posted Monday, June 01, 2009 01:11 PM
I have spent way too much time in the past week trying to recover money that was mine, until someone stole it. This OAN Services Outfit and Odyssey Streaming Radio was charging me $15.85 a month for some bullshit digital music that I allegedley bought online. I DONT LISTEN TO DIGITAL RADIO ON THE COMPUTER AND I NEVER CARED TO. I NEVER BOUGHT THIS!! AND I NEVER HAD ANY DESIRE TO DO SO!! So I'm now getting $90 credited to my account. Of course that does not help me now.
About a week ago I discovered that I was getting charged $11.95 for a Google Success Kit, and $4.95 a month for an identity theft protection program, and $14.95 a month for some bullshit fraud protection that I never signed up for. WTF is going on in this world these days? These fucking people are making millions of dollars off of people like us, literally robbing us of the money we make from our 9 to 5 jobs, and nobody is doing anything about it. Like it's legal. Am I missing something? Aside from my money that is...
I did get most of the money back from the aforementioned Google scam, but I'm still short about $50 from the whole damn ordeal. I really dont understand how people can get away with this.
Watch for any suspicious charges on your online banking statement. Also do the same when you look at your telephon... [More]
Posted Friday, March 21, 2008 07:11 PM
No Play Yesterday...
One play tonight...
Let's bring home the loot tonight!