andarmac99's Blog

Telling trends about playoff teams that tank in Week 17

By andarmac99 | View all Posts
Posted Sunday, January 03, 2010 07:44 AM   17 comments

We've all heard or know how big momentum is in the game of football and how tough it is to get it back after it is lost whether that be through a loss or a break in action (bye). But check this out:


Since the NFL playoffs expanded to 12 teams in 1990 with the #1 and #2 seeds in each conference owning a first round bye there have been 23 times where a #1 or #2 seed has LOST their final regular season game (more often than not resting starters and tanking) and then had their bye. But unbelievably only 3 of those 23 #1 or #2 seeds that lost their final regular season game went on to win the Super Bowl!!!! 3 out of 23 in 19 years! I think that speaks volumes as to how big of a factor momentum is in this game and just how utterly STUPID it is to rest starters and tank your final regular season game if you have a bye after that, effectively killing any momentum.


The 3 winners?


1999 Rams

1994 49ers

1991 Redskins


It's interesting to note that it has not happened in 10 years and two of the wins came back in an age where power teams ruled and a wild card or lower seed making noise was almost an afterthought.


Look what has happened just since 2002 (when the NFL expanded to 8 division winners and only 4 wild cards got in):


Since 2002 there have been 12  #1 or #2 seeds that have lost their final regular season game. They are 0 for 12 in Super Bowl wins. Half of them (6) have gone down on their home field in their first game. 3 more have gone down on their home field in the conference finals, and of just the 3 teams to make it to the Super Bowl all 3 have gone down in the big game. Those 12 teams combined to go an ugly 7-14 ATS and suffered many SU losses as favorites.


I guess the message is here if the Colts, Chargers, Saints, or Vikings/Eagles (this year's potential #1 and #2 seeds) decide to tank Week 17 then it is just about the equivalent to suicide as far as their Super Bowl hopes go. I'm not saying they won't win the big game if they lose in Week 17 but holy shit, history certainly says their chances are slim at best!

17 comments
comment Post A Comment
glyde69 says:
01/03/10 09:56AM
andarmac99 says:
01/03/10 11:45AM


Great point. I have it at 14 out of the 53 which is just over twice as often (26.4% to 13%) as a team that loses their final regular season game. It's happened 4 times since 2002 when the NFL slightly changed their playoff format like I mentioned in the 1st post, compared to 0 wins during that time for #1 or #2 seeds who lose their last regular season.

Good investigative journalism by me not providing the amount of times teams have won doing this.
andarmac99 says:
01/03/10 11:46AM
Ice4Blood says:
01/03/10 11:49AM

excellent info... it's surprising to me that NFL teams have not yet figured this out... it is a VERY SIMPLE formula... it works like this...

 

if you have a choice between a) resting all of your starters for the playoffs, or b) playing for a win to take momentum into the playoffs... and you choose option a)... just tell all of your fans not to show up for the playoffs games and save their money for next year, because your season is officially over...

 

with this in mine, the Colts season is over... they will lose in the first round of the playoffs...

theclaw says:
01/03/10 12:37PM

Good Stuff !!!!!!!!

I beleive it's free agency which began in 1993 and weakened teams so the top seeds could no longer dominate.

However, free agency made it easier for the top teams to win games in the regular season as we see how many records were set for wins by Pats and Colts and many other records that haven't been mentioned by the pundits in regards to winning.

However, the postseason has been a completely different animal, the top seeds don't dominate in the postseason the way they did before free agency.

The decline began in about the 1997 season, from 1978 ( the first season of the 16 game shcedule) to 1996.....

we had just 3 wild card teams make the SB, 3 out of 38 teams or 8%

from 1997 to 2008 we had 8 WC teams make the SB or 33%, 4 times as many.

from 1978 to 1996, we had 1 WC team win the SB OR 5%.

FROM 1997 to 2008 we had 5 WC teams win the SB OR 42%

Almost 50% of teams winning SB are WC teams now-a-days, and considering that Titans in 2000 SB came-up 1 foot short of sending game to OT.

And the Panthers lost on a last second field goal by the Pats and Zona lost a game last season they easily could of won, it's damn near possible we could have more wild card teams winning the SB than 1 or 2 seeds.

Can't really explain what's going on, but something is, and it kind-of points to free agency.

 

budwiser says:
01/03/10 12:42PM

that stat is horsesh!t on the surface and i'll tell u why mathematically.

essentially you are picking 4 teams (2 #1s and 2 #2s)

Only one can win the super bowl

Divide 23 by 4, you get 6

So, means 3 of 6 times the team wins the super bowl (and the other 3 of course don't)

Good idea, but waste of time, I'm telling you.

thatsagoodone says:
01/03/10 01:04PM
good read bro
SharpShooter8 says:
01/04/10 10:20AM

Superbowl contenders:

1) Dallas

2) San Diego

3) Green Bay

4) Indianapolis

5) New Orleans

6) Minnesota

7) Philadelphia

8) New England

9) Baltimore

10) Cincinatti

11) NY Jets

12) Arizona

cheeser says:
01/04/10 04:02PM
the downside of using top players to win season ending game is wes welker
byharleyjames says:
01/17/10 08:41PM
Here it is....this applies this week
willywagtail says:
01/08/11 04:03AM
Both the colts and saints lost week 17 and ended up in the superbowl. So much for "3 out of 23 in 19 years"

Only Chicago lost week 17 this season. I guess it's pretty much a lock the Bears won't win the bowl. They are at -1350 not to win the bowl at matchbook.
bill702 says:
01/08/11 05:06AM
Do you know of any casinos that put those odds down willy?
bill702 says:
01/08/11 05:07AM
I wont put more then 1000 in an online sportsbook, but if I found a casino that has odds like that im interested to know..
hozer says:
01/08/11 05:23AM
Maybe Im not understanding... but didnt the Saints lose there last game of the season last year
Michfan15 says:
01/08/11 01:09PM
too hung over to read thru all of this, looks good tho
Michfan15 says:
01/08/11 01:09PM
cubicman says:
01/08/11 01:23PM
Add your response:
Please note that the blogger has the option of reviewing all comments before they are displayed to the public. Your comment may not be published immediately.
 

Profile

User: andarmac99
Joined: April 2007
Location:
Team:
Occupation:

Recent Posts

Archive

Categories

Advertisement