As for brohm, he was not the back up last yr. He lost that spot to Matt Flynn, a national championship winning QB from LSU. Although undersized, i like him as a back up.

Lastly, FlyersFan, i am 50/50 on Vick. I think he would be a nice option to have vick as a back up...not a true QB, however, he brings experience to the backup position and is a tremendous athlete. IF the pack were to get him, they would get him for cheap. They could show the rest of the league that he has changed his ways (assuming he has) and trade him off later in the yr. to a team who is in need of a QB ( for whatever reason i.e. starter got hurt, etc.). In that case they could get a few late round draft picks for him. In that situation I think it would be a great move, cause I like Ted Thompsons abilit to find talent late in the draft. I just wouldnt like it because Rodgers does not need another media circus again. I do give Rodgers a ton of credit though, he took everything the media threw at him with class. He earned my respect 100%. Lastly, i agree with thomspon getting rid of favre when he did. He looked like a poor move at first, however, we saw how favre collapsed late last yr and with rodgers contract ending the following yr, who is to say he wouldnt have looked elsewhere. Than we would be stuck the Oakland trying to land a franchise guy. The Thomspon believed he would be the face of the franchise, and although the record didnt show it (mainly because of a poor defense last yr) Rodgers played great. 4k in passing 26 (or was it 28? ) TD last yr and 12 picks. Very solid season.

Go pack Go