joepa510's Blog

Who will finish with more majors - Tiger or Federer?

By joepa510 | View all Posts
Posted Monday, June 08, 2009 09:17 AM   12 comments
With Federers win today they both sit at 14.. Tiger is 33 Federer is 27.   I see Federer playing another 4-5 years and winning at least another 5-6 majors over that time.  TIger i see playing until his early 40's and winning at least that many.  Even though Tiger is 6 years older I see him playing a bit longer and giving him a slight edge... Those two have become buddies over the years and i bet they talk about it all the time...
Report Abuse
 
12 comments
comment Post A Comment
bigboofy says:
06/08/09 12:32PM
Tiger for sure. Much more pro life left. Federer will not will 5-6 more, as he is a bit long in the tooth in tennis years. Also, the competition for him is nearing their prime, early 20's, and getting better.
dcchan4 says:
06/08/09 03:51PM
tiger, tennis is a young mans game, fed maybe wins 3 more
CrusCrnshw says:
06/08/09 05:43PM
Tiger can easily win 2 a year if he gets back on track, maybe even 3. He should be able to at least average 1+ over the next 6-7 years..maybe more.

 

Fed wont get Roland Garros again. I see him being a top 2 player in the world for another 3 years maybe? Then a slide...I dont see any majors (other than 1 or so) out of him after 2012ish...

 

so by those standards I see him with another 4-5 championships

sharpaction says:
06/08/09 05:43PM
If Tiger wins on avg 1 major a year, in 10 years he will have 24. I see Fed getting a maximum of 20.
pederson16 says:
06/08/09 05:44PM
tiger.... fed is done after next year...  are we counting senior pga tour majors?
wallstreetcappers says:
06/08/09 08:54PM
I watched 15 min of last weekends tourney and my mind started wondering if Tiger is taking supplements, he does not look right at all.

I hear he gets tested blah blah blah but the PGA is probably pretty weak on substance testing since who out there looks like they are cheating using the juice? Outside Tiger I dont see anyone even close..

It wouldnt shock me if he was either to be honest.


banans says:
06/08/09 09:06PM
tiger, hands down. 27 is old for tennis. I would bet a line of Tiger -5
kickinA says:
06/08/09 10:25PM

Beat me to it.

0207jcb says:
06/09/09 01:57AM
Tennis is an actual sport....it takes athletic ability. Golf is like billiards or throwing darts....a fun GAME to play when your drunk! Tiger Woods is not an athlete.
gfoss59 says:
06/09/09 02:34AM
Tiger, easily. In fact, he'll double F. up.
joepa510 says:
06/09/09 04:35AM
both sports are soooooooooooo difficult... i acutually played college tennis for 4 years and i am about a 14 handicapp in golf... it's actually pretty funny of the 8 guys that i played college tennis with about 6 of them are all awesome golfers.. one of them tried to qualifty for the us open.. one is about a scratch golfer..    i haven't played tennis in years.. love playing golf.. but in my IMO they are the two hardest sports to excel at... 
SecondAgain says:
06/09/09 05:22AM
you're an idiot
Add your response:
Please note that the blogger has the option of reviewing all comments before they are displayed to the public. Your comment may not be published immediately.
 

Profile

User: joepa510
Joined: October 2007
Location: Utah
Team: Penn State Nittany Lions
Occupation: Other

Recent Posts

Archive

open2011
open2009
open2008

Categories

Advertisement