bloggity blog

aaaa1... here are some questions that this raises for me:   first, i have known about these installations since about 1996, thanks to a co-worker who educated me about it...   now, i have had a working theory of my own, based completely on my own observations, and wondering if you can confirm this... my theory has never failed to predict what has happened or is happening now... it is based purely on what i call a trend in the US election results (and candidates) dating back to the 1950's... this is the crux of it...   around 1950 the CIA essentially took over US elections... they decided that the American people no longer knew what was good for them, so the CIA (or other heads of heads of state) found a way that they could put someone in the White House to be a pawn and serve their means... maybe they were rigging elections at some point, i'm not sure... what i believe they were doing was setting up the public to vote for their candidate (neither Dem nor Rep)...   the first slip up came with JFK... he was a trouble maker in their eyes, and definitely didn't fit the pawn role... he slipped through the cracks... and we see what happened to him... his assassination was no joke...   aside: my stepdad thinks if Obama gets elected he is an assassination risk... i told him "no!"... Presidents in the age of the CIA can only be assassinated from within... hence, the very professional job on JFK (and Robert Kennedy, for that matter)...   ok... [More]