Posted Saturday, March 10, 2012 02:53 AM
Pretty ironic that the covers article that listed two teams to fade in conference tourneys mentioned North Carolina and Michigan State. The article claimed that these teams/coaches did not care about the conference tournament which was backed up with ATS stats. Of course both these teams covered in their first tourney game today. Even more remarkable is that the article also mentioned two teams to back because they care about winning the conference tournament. Those teams were Duke and Kentucky. Guess how they did against the spread today, oh yeah, they both did not cover the spread. Shocking. Could Covers be in bed with the bookies and be trying to convince the public to back the wrong teams? Not that I am a conspiracy theorist but the Covers article did go 0-4 today. Food for thought.
Posted Saturday, March 05, 2011 05:34 PM
Have to post my first pick ever on the site on South Fla. +12 for 2 units. Although it is senior night and blackout night for the team with probably the most seniors I have ever seen, I think that will actually hurt my favorite team tonight at Carnesecca. There will be a lot of crying and a lot of pressure with all the families there. I believe South Florida will play desperate for a win and I think the last game played against a tough Pitt team will help them be ready for this one. I see my Redmen winning a close one.