aaaa1... here are some questions that this raises for me:
first, i have known about these installations since about 1996, thanks to a co-worker who educated me about it...
now, i have had a working theory of my own, based completely on my own observations, and wondering if you can confirm this... my theory has never failed to predict what has happened or is happening now... it is based purely on what i call a trend in the US election results (and candidates) dating back to the 1950's... this is the crux of it...
around 1950 the CIA essentially took over US elections... they decided that the American people no longer knew what was good for them, so the CIA (or other heads of heads of state) found a way that they could put someone in the White House to be a pawn and serve their means... maybe they were rigging elections at some point, i'm not sure... what i believe they were doing was setting up the public to vote for their candidate (neither Dem nor Rep)...
the first slip up came with JFK... he was a trouble maker in their eyes, and definitely didn't fit the pawn role... he slipped through the cracks... and we see what happened to him... his assassination was no joke...
aside: my stepdad thinks if Obama gets elected he is an assassination risk... i told him "no!"... Presidents in the age of the CIA can only be assassinated from within... hence, the very professional job on JFK (and Robert Kennedy, for that matter)...
ok, if we look at every President from JFK to Carter, they all fit the role of a pawn (whether they be Dem or Rep)... these guys (the inside men) aren't dumb... they know they can't stick to just one or the other party, because the failures of one administration will inevitably result in the rise of the opposing party in the next administration, or soon after... in some years, they have even managed to get pawns from both parties onto the ticket (1984? 2004?)... this provides a safeguard against losing their guy midstream (since they want them in for 8 years)...
like i said, every Presidency up through Carter fits this bill... Carter was another to slip through the cracks... however, due to circumstances, it was easy to get him out of the White House, because he was blamed for many problems (Iran hostage crisis, among others)... Carter pointed out in a famous speech that the US needed to lose its dependency on foreign oil, and that if we did not we would fall victim to economic crises, and would have to re-evaluate what we meant by "freedom"... he was the only true President of the past 30 years...
this is where the CIA stepped up their game... they knew the American public could not resist a positive-spinning Actor ("this country's best days are ahead of us... do not listen to the doomsayers!")... we gobbled it up with Reagan...
but notice who was behind this pawn of all pawns... George Bush, former head of the CIA... Reagan/Bush ran the country for 8 years, and the next 8 years were followed by more Bush... that means a former head of the CIA was in office for 16 years... Clinton comes along (they needed a Democrat BAD!!!), and he was just what the doctor ordered... housewives everywhere were aching for the second coming of JFK... smooth talking Southerner, good looking, charming... no problemo! Clinton was a joyride President... there to do only one thing... nothing! enjoy your Presidential limo ride... he enjoyed it so much he was getting blowjobs in the backseat while he served his term...
back to the Republicans, and the era of Bush... another lip-service President, cowboy persona... but most importantly, an extension of the Bush/Reagan years... 24 out of 32 years with an extension of the CIA running the show...
they almost lost it in 2000, but made sure they got it by stealing Florida...
this theory will be discarded by most, and called hogwash... but the fact is, i have been able to predict every single winner since Carter by applying this theory, and just looking at the profiles of the two candidates... puppet wins every time (except for Bush Sr... the puppet-master!)...
consider this... in 2004, when everyone (EVERYONE) wanted Bush out, there was an open invitation for Dems to walk into the White House... so who do they put on the ticket? John Kerry??? this was a dead beat candidate if there ever was one... he was a candidate that was meant to take a dive... he had no chance!
so now what? this year we have all the top names of the Democratic ticket running, and right out of the gate, who is in the lead? Barrack Obama! seriously? how did this happen? i mean, yea, i can see he's another smooth-talking charming, lip-service positive-spinning say-nothing candidate... but how does he get to the top of the Dem ticket going against so many big name candidates?
answer: money! lots and lots of it! he has raised more money than any Presidential candidate in US history... and this from a man who clearly has a Muslim background (father from Kenya, raised in Jakarta), in a time when Americans are terrified of Muslims worldwide... how does a shady character like this get so much money thrown at him? where is it coming from?
answer: we don't know... we can't know! because there is a legislation that prohibits the tracking of money involving any donation less than $200... well, you say, $200 is nothing... that can't amount to much... try $240 million out of the $450 million he has raised so far... more than half cannot be traced, and is accounted for by extremely small donations...
are you kidding? if we were to assume that all of that money is coming from donations from inside the US, and we figure the average donation is around $100 (this is DEFINITELY generous in these times of financial difficulty, coming from Dems who supposedly represent the middle and lower classes)... that would mean that 2.4 million US citizens have reached into their pockets to throw old Barrack a $100 bill... 10% of the US population!!!
who is really believing that for one second!? i guarantee you, that is not happening... GUARANTEED! so where is that money coming from? and why does nobody care?
remember that little rigging in 2000?... people think it's all about the Republican party, and they are too simplistic to get beyond that (these powers-that-be know exactly how the masses think)... but look at what is going on right now... ACORN (associated with Obama) is implicated in another rigging job... some 100,000 shady voter registrations just in Ohio alone...
so aaaa1... how far off is this theory? because if it is correct, Obama will take the White House, and he is the one who is going to lead us into this mass genocide...
he is, afterall, trying to get us into a war in Afghanistan, which anyone with a brain knows is a death trap, that will only turn into a holy war... a Jihad!
save the "this is crazy-talk" from people who insist on being uninformed... i am curious to hear what aaaa1 says...
beyond that, this whole issue with the death camps really doesn't help anyone, because what anyone needs to know is what they can do, and most importantly, when to do it... timing is the key, and who has any idea about the timing of it all... that is what we need to figure out...
i predict that there will be a global event early in Obama's term (not sure how early)... it will be either 1) a terrorist attack on US soil comparable to 911, 2) a nuclear attack on foreign soil, or 3) a terrorist attack on UK or Israel...
any of these would lead to a scenario where the US gov't could institute marshall law, and set this ball rolling...
what say you, aaaa1?